“Those who lose their life for my sake will save it” (a sermon for Palm Sunday)

     A lot can happen in a week.  Just ask Jesus.  While Jesus is, rightly, the centre of attention in the Gospel narratives of Holy Week, I’d like for us to consider this morning the “elephants in Jerusalem”, i.e. the disciples.  What were the disciples experiencing during the final seven days of… “the-Present-Age phase of”… the life of Jesus?  A lot happened for the disciples during Holy Week.  Dreams tittered on the brink of fulfillment, only to be dashed to smithereens and then resurrected in a new form, all in the space of eight sunsets.  Then again, the Bible tells us that God “made the heavens and the earth” in the space of a week… the transition from an empty, watery chaos to an ordered cosmos teeming with life was also quite a change – and perhaps the Genesis story is a worthy template of how life so often goes.  Our lives frequently swing to and fro between chaos and stability, between job loss and the beginning of new careers, between shattered relationships and new ones, between despairing disorientation and new horizons gleaming with hope.

     Back to the disciples.  In Mark’s narrative, ever since Jesus asked them “Who do you say I am?” in chapter 8 – a question to which Peter had replied, “You are the Messiah”, i.e. the one anointed to be king of Israel – the disciples had thrilled to the thought that their Rabbi was the king-in-waiting and they were his closest friends. 

“They were on the road, going up to Jerusalem, and Jesus was walking ahead of them; they were amazed, and those who followed were afraid.” (Mk. 10.32)

Repeated, rather detailed predictions of Jesus’ coming suffering and death notwithstanding, the apostles clearly expected the kingdom of God to be established in Jerusalem very soon, with Jesus, a descendant of David, enthroned in glory, victorious over the enemies of the people of God, as King David had been all those centuries before.  After all, David himself had had to live as a king-in-waiting for many years while Saul ruthlessly hunted him.  But David’s time had eventually come, and now, thought the disciples, so had Jesus’s. 

     Within the logic of Mark’s Gospel, it is fitting that the last person Jesus sees before his arrival in Jerusalem is both blind and – though blind – recognizes that he is the Messiah (10.47-48).  Granted, James and John – who had approached Jesus right before the account of the healing of Bar-Timaeus with their request for seats of “glory” either side of Jesus (10.35-40) – also believe that Jesus is a king, but they remain “blind” to what Jesus means by “glory”, as well as to the “throne” that Jesus will occupy at the moment when he is flanked by men “on his right and on his left” (cf. 15.27).

     As Jesus crests the Mount of Olives (11.1), overlooking the Kidron Valley with a clear line of sight to the walls of Jerusalem crowning Mount Zion, he sends two of his disciples into the village of Bethany with orders to commandeer a young donkey for him.  This is a fulfillment of a prophetic dream of a king who would arrive, not on a war-horse, but on a barnyard beast of burden.  The prophet Zechariah had envisioned a king victorious, but humble, an irenic warrior – who would establish a kingdom of peace “to the ends of the earth”.  It is hard to think of a more fitting image for the type of Messiah that Jesus has been trying to teach his apostles he is.  As Jesus leads his triumphal procession through the gates of Zion, the crowds of pilgrims hail the “coming kingdom of our father David” (11.10).  David, of course, had been promised an eternal “house”, i.e. dynasty.  Yahweh had promised David that there would always be one of his descendants (“sons”) on the throne of Jerusalem.  Hence, when Bar-Timaeus had called Jesus the “Son of David”, this is precisely what he meant (cf. 10.47-48).  It is finally time for the kingdom – that Jesus had proclaimed since day one (cf. 1.15) – to be established…but what exactly will that look like?  Jesus did indeed come to Jerusalem to fight – not with weapons, but with words.  Like Jeremiah before him, Jesus was convinced that the Temple and its hierarchy had become hopelessly corrupt and were ripe for judgment.  Jesus came to confront those same people who had slandered him in Galilee, those who had accused him of being in league with Satan and of being demon-possessed (cf. Mk. 3.22-30).  Then, Jesus had accused his accusers of blasphemy, and soon, they will return the favour (cf. 14.64).

     Several dark themes converge as Jesus enters Jerusalem and teaches day-by-day in the Temple.  Not only will Jesus suffer, but Jesus predicts that his entire generation will experience a time of intense suffering, not least of which will include the destruction of the Temple and the city of Jerusalem (Mk. 13.1-2, 30).  Through all of these dark and traumatic events, the kingdom of God will be established, as the crowd of pilgrims had sung during Jesus’ triumphal entry (cf. Mk. 11.9-10).  However, this kingdom will not be won through victory…

     Jesus came to Jerusalem as a prophet of doom – to announce and enact the outpouring of God’s wrath on the Temple, just as Jeremiah had done six centuries earlier.  There had always been a prophetic dimension to Jesus’ mission.  In Galilee, Jesus had spent much time speaking “the word” (of God) to the crowds who thronged around him in search of healing (cf. Mk. 2.2; 4.1-9, 33).  The subject of Jesus’ message was the kingdom of God (cf. 1.14-15; 4.26-32).  The prophets of ancient Israel had proclaimed oracles on behalf of Yahweh; they had declared “This is what God says…” (e.g. Jer. 2.2, 5; 4.3; 5.14; 6.9, 16, 21-22; 7.3, 20-21, etc.).  However, Jesus never prefaced his words with this formula – he simply spoke “the word” (cf. 1.21-22).  As people listened to Jesus’ parables and watched his healings/exorcisms, they assumed that he was a prophetic figure like John the Baptist, Elijah or one of the other prophets of old (cf. 6.14-15; 8.27-28).

     Once Jesus arrives in Jerusalem, he fully unveils the prophetic aspect of his multi-faceted identity.  Like Jeremiah before him, Jesus was convinced that the national shrine and its hierarchy had become hopelessly corrupt and was ripe for judgment.  From the moment of his arrival in the capital, Jesus launches an assault on the Temple – first, he curses a fig tree and then proceeds to overturn the tables and chairs of the moneychangers (quoting Jer. 7.11 as he does so), thus temporarily interrupting the routine of sacrifices and mounting a very public challenge to the authority of the chief priests (cf. 11.12-19, 27-33).  Jesus’ adversaries immediately start looking for a way to kill him (11.18; this was a typical reaction to prophetic activity: cf. Jer. 26.7-11), and are only delayed in their plans by the presence of the crowd, who functions as Jesus’ bodyguard for several days as he teaches in the Temple courts.  Indeed, any words or actions that could be interpreted as constituting a threat against the Temple were considered highly treasonous and worthy of death (cf. Ac. 6.12-15; 7.47-60).  In Mark chapter 13, Jesus offers a detailed prophecy – as Jeremiah had done concerning Solomon’s Temple – of the destruction of Herod’s Temple (cf. Jer. Chapters 7 and 26).  Though Mark presents Jesus as having proclaimed this prophecy in the presence of only four of his disciples (13.1-4), during his trial before the Sanhedrin, Jesus is accused of having spoken words against the Temple (14.55-59).  Evidently, word had spread about Jesus’ actions/messages against the national shrine.

     As he had described in his parable of the wicked tenants, Jesus was the last in a long line of messengers from Yahweh, spokesmen who had been despised and killed by (the leaders of) the people of God (cf. 12.1-9).  However, as the Psalmist had said, there would be a vindication for the rejected Son:

The stone that the builders rejected
    has become the chief cornerstone.
This is the Lord’s doing;
    it is marvelous in our eyes.
This is the day that the Lord has made;
    let us rejoice and be glad in it.” (Psalm 118.21-24; cf. Mk. 12.10-11)

     The ruining of lives.  As it becomes apparent that they are not, after all, the intimate associates of the soon-to-be-crowned king, but rather the accomplices of a heretical rabble-rouser (a.k.a. a true prophet), the disciples must have wondered if perhaps they had backed the wrong donkey.  Their illusions of immanent grandeur evaporate in the heat of the hatred directed against their master.  They had come to Jerusalem thinking that all their dreams were about to come true, that they were going to “live the Jewish dream”; instead, they realize with mounting horror that they have left everything behind for…what?  To follow a prophetic figure who, as it appears, is about to suffer a similar – or perhaps worse – fate to that of John the Baptist.  The disciples find themselves up against the question that every prophet (or prophet’s disciple) has to face: how does a servant of God measure success? 

     As the late spiritual writer Brendan Manning said of a late American singer-songwriter: “Jesus of Nazareth ruined Rich Mullin’s life.  And out of the ruins he recreated a ragamuffin of startling originality; no human being who has crossed my path even remotely resembles him”.  Dietrich Bonhoeffer said, “When Christ calls a wo/man to follow him, he bids them come and die”.  As Jesus said to Ananias of Damascus about Saul of Tarsus: “I will show him how much he must suffer for the sake of my name” (Ac. 9.16).  As Paul, once he had changed his name, said: “I regard everything as loss because of the surpassing value of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord. For his sake I have suffered the loss of all things…” (Phil. 3.8).  As Paul said elsewhere: “I have been crucified with Christ; and it is no longer I who live, but it is Christ who lives in me. And the life I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me” (Gal. 2.19-20).

     On pursuing sainthood.[1]  American theologian and Bishop Robert Barron shares the anecdote of a memorable exchange that a young Thomas Merton had with a friend, early on in his life as a Christian, which led the young convert to conclude that his Christian faith was not about getting his ideas straight, but rather a matter of getting his life straight.  The goal of the Christian life is to become a saint, to walk the way of Jesus.[2]

     Three paths to holiness.  To that end, Barron presents his readers with three paths to holiness, as well as a set of practices that embody each path and shape the desires of the pilgrim on the way. 

     The first path is “finding the center”, i.e. to encounter the love of God, the love of the One who is the very act of being itself, the center of all reality.  One of the spiritual practices that demonstrates that one has found the center is, appropriately enough for Lent, fasting.  Fasting, the temporary refusal to feed the many relatively superficial human needs, is designed to identify and feed the truest human hunger, the need for God.[3] 

     The second path is “knowing you’re a sinner”.  Barron insists that those who can freely acknowledge their sins are participating in the center, i.e. they are on the path to sainthood.  Those with the humility to confess their sin and turn back (repent) to the center who is more than willing to forgive are positioned to grow in godliness.[4] 

     The third path is “realizing your life is not about you”.  Barron encourages his readers to embrace the “theo-drama” of which their lives are a part.  It is by living in light of one’s God-given purpose – itself a part of the divine plan, a plan that is not particularly concerned with one’s private “happiness” – that one can experience true joy and freedom.[5]  Barron concludes by once again putting his readers at the foot of the cross, the same “place” where he begins his work.  As Jesus dies on Calvary, we witness the love of the triune God in action, (literally) embodied.  Jesus invites us to participate in that divine and dangerous love, detaching ourselves from the chains of self.  True “detachment” was experienced by him who was himself attached to the cross, in utter abandonment to the Father’s will.  This is the mystery of life as Jesus has revealed it to us – “whoever loses his life…will save it”.[6]

     As they sang Hosanna! On Palm Sunday, little did the disciples know that they were singing a lament for the life upon which they thought they were about to embark at the court of the king.  Jesus had brought them to Jerusalem to ruin their egocentric lives and allow their God-centred lives to begin on the far side of the death of their “false selves”.  As Thomas Merton said, “For me to be a saint is to be myself”.  Jesus called the disciples in order to reveal to them who they really were.  They were not courtiers and magistrates, judges of Gentiles and arbiters of Messianic legislation – no, they were witnesses to something to which the world is by and large blind and deaf.  The disciples had been called to hear the words of God spoken by God’s Son and to see the creative, life-giving power of God at work in the King of Israel, the hands of whom are the hands of a healer.  Out of the chaos of Good Friday, the Creator would once gain create something new…

     So, what about you?  Are you, like I so often find myself doing, clinging to a selfish, self-aggrandizing, convenient and comfortable vision of your life and your future?  If so, prepare to let that self-centred dream die and allow God’s dream for you to be born.  Abandon your role in the ego-drama and embrace your place in the theo-drama.  There is no crown without the cross.  But if we can firmly resolve to finish Lent by being crucified with Christ (yet again), then, and only then, can we hope to taste the glorious reality of Easter.  Jesus makes all things new and has made all things beautiful in his time.  Amen.



[1] Robert Barron, The Strangest Way: Walking the Christian Path, Maryknoll: Orbis Books, 2002.

[2] Barron, Robert, The Strangest Way: Walking the Christian Path, Maryknoll: Orbis Books, 2002, pp. 9-30.

[3] Ibid, pp. 31-66.

[4] Ibid, pp. 67-112.

[5] Ibid, pp. 113—162.

[6] Ibid, pp. 163-68.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Protestant Reformation - good news?

GOD'S NEW WORLD, DAY 30 (the God who suffers the wrath of man)

Re-imagining Christianity, part 2