An Ephesian interlude (7): a reflection for Day 15 of Lent
“Paul entered the synagogue and for three months spoke out boldly and argued persuasively about the kingdom of God. When some stubbornly refused to believe and spoke evil of the Way before the congregation, he left them, taking the disciples with him, and argued daily in the lecture hall of Tyrannus.” (Acts 19.8-9) We have seen that Luke takes pains to record declarations by imperial power-players of the blamelessness of his protagonists ( Jesus : Lk. 23.4, 14, 22; Paul : Ac. 26.30-32). According to one scholarly theory, the book of Acts consists of Luke’s “evidence” of Paul’s innocence of any capital charges – evidence that Luke intended to submit during Paul’s trial before the imperial tribunal in Rome (cf. Ac. 25.10-12; 28.30-31). If this is true, then Luke, with his two-volume work, is doing for Jesus and Paul what Plato had done for Socrates following Socrates’ condemnation by the “council of 500” of Athens to die by drinking ...