GEMS FROM JEREMIAH (21) Jeremiah the marriage counselor: The mindset of a prophet, part V

 


There are many familial images for Yahweh’s relationship with his people.  Israel is called both Yahweh’s “firstborn son” (Ex. 4.22) and “treasured possession” (Ex. 19.5; cf. Dt. 7.7-10) – images drawn from Israel’s experience of being rescued from slavery in Egypt.  When the prophets looked back on this determinative moment in Israel’s history, they often chose yet another image to describe God’s love for his people – that of husband and wife.

“…call to Jerusalem…I remember your youthful loyalty, our love as newlyweds.  You stayed with me through the wilderness years…”

(Jer. 2.1-2 The Message; cf. Ez. 16.8-14; Hosea 2.14, 4.15; Is. 43.1-7; 54.5-8).

Before we have time to get sentimental about this, Scripture calls us to face the reality of human brokenness as it shows us that Israel, Yahweh’s bride, is unfaithful to her divine husband.  The dominating metaphor for Israel’s idolatry (i.e., worshipping other gods) is that of adultery.  The prophets don’t shy away from frequently applying the epithet of “whore” to the people of God (e.g., Jer. 3.1-5; Ez. 16.15-58).  Israel is a chronic cheater – she is constantly betraying the God who chose, rescued, guided and provided for her by giving her allegiance/trust[1] (i.e., faith) to other gods who can do nothing for her besides rob her of her humanity.

     What does Yahweh do about this sad state of affairs?  Does he abandon his people?  Does he walk away from his unfaithful bride?  No – God takes his people to court, he pleads[2] with her, he presents the evidence of his faithfulness to his people over the centuries.  Yahweh patiently remonstrates with his wayward wife.  He provides opportunity after opportunity for his people to repent, to change her mind and return to respecting the terms of the marriage contract (i.e., the covenant).  As a go-between, Jeremiah is called to play the role of both marriage counselor and practitioner of family law.


[1] Cf. Beale, G.K. We Become What We Worship: A Biblical Theology of Idolatry, Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2008, p. 17: Your god is “whatever your heart clings to or relies on for ultimate security.  The idol is whatever claims the loyalty that belongs to God alone”.

[2] Cf. Brown, Michael L. “Jeremiah” in Longman & Garland, eds. The Expositor’s Bible Commentary 7: Jeremiah-Ezekiel, Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2010, p. 86.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A 40-DAY JOURNEY WITH THE KING: Lenten reflections from Mark’s Gospel (5)

Image
“A leper came to him begging him, and kneeling he said to him, “If you choose, you can make me clean .”   Moved with pity, Jesus stretched out his hand and touched him, and said to him, “I do choose. Be made clean !” Immediately the leprosy left him, and he was made clean .   (Mk. 1.40-42)      Along with exorcisms, Jesus performs many healings of various physical ailments in the early chapters of Mark’s Gospel.   Jesus’ first healing is that of Simon’s mother-in-law (1.29-31).   With the restoration of the leper, we begin to understand the meaning of Jesus’ healings (and exorcisms).   The thrice-repeated word “clean” in the above passage reveals what is truly going on when the King restores the members of the people of God to wholeness.   Leprosy rendered its victim “unclean”, i.e., it proscribed that person from participation in the life of the community, of both civil society and the worship/litur...
Read more

The Protestant Reformation - good news?

Image
  The study of Reformation Europe makes many Christians wish that they had lived in the 16th century. Name 1) Some good reasons for not living in the sixteenth century and 2) Some ways in which we can live more deliberately as Christians today because of the events of that century. How should it and how should it not make a difference?    Some good reasons for not living in the 16th century include the climate of religious intolerance and violence.   Religious affiliation and observance were compulsory and imposed on the people by the state, especially it seems, in Protestant countries.   There was no freedom of conscience, except perhaps in England during the reign of Elizabeth, where the windows to people’s souls remained shut to the state, so long as they publicly conformed to the monarch’s religion (as enforced by parliament).   One may have thought that Luther’s appeal to conscience at the Diet of Worms would have inspired a broader and more sensit...
Read more

“Walking the tightrope” (St. Luke’s: Wednesday, August 22nd, 2018: Ez. 34.1-11; Ps. 23; St. Mt. 20.1-16)

Image
Ancient relevance.   Any conscientious catholic who has the habit of watching the news cannot help but notice a direct link between today’s first reading and what is going on in the Church these days.   Last week, a grand jury released a report detailing the results of their 2-year long investigation into dozens of clergymen who had abused upwards of 1,000 children in various dioceses in the state of Pennsylvania.   Every time cases of the abuse of children by priests and religious come to light, we are reminded that we live in a world – and are part of a Church – deeply infected by evil .   And of course, let’s not forget that the line between good and evil runs through each one of us (cf. Solzhenitsyn).   In today’s first reading, the prophet Ezekiel proclaims an oracle of judgment against the false “shepherds” of God’s “flock”.   Instead of caring for, protecting and nurturing God’s people , Israel’s leaders had exploited the people for their...
Read more