Posts

On Anselm's Cur Deus Homo, Book I

Image
  Text of Anselm's Cur Deus Homo?      Anselm endowed his apologia [1] for the doctrine of the incarnation with a playful, tongue-in-cheek character.   In a manner reminiscent of Paul’s sophisticated rant against sophistry in 2 Cor. 11-12, Anselm offers a very reasonable defence of the necessity of God becoming man and dying in order to restore life to the world, all the while poking fun at those who would attempt to base their faith on reason. [2]   Anselm’s approach to theology is fides quaerens intellectum (cf. chapters I-II).   For Anselm, faith is not the conclusion of a syllogism [3] , but rather a gift of God [4] , the understanding of which is to be pursued by the believer’s use of reason; faith, however, remains a gift which, although not altogether opaque to reason, nevertheless remains beyond the tethers of human rationality.      To achieve his rhetorical ends, Anselm writes his defence in a form approximating a Socr...

On Augustine's Treatise Concerning the Correction of the Donatists

Image
Text of Augustine's Treatise        The origins of the Donatist controversy are to be found in the Diocletian persecution of the early fourth century, during which many clergymen surrendered “sacred books” under duress.   This would prove to be the final imperial attack on the Church, as the persecution of Christians within the empire was brought to an end with Constantine’s “Edict of Milan” in AD 313. [1]   The issue began with the disciples of one Donatus moving to have him consecrated Bishop of Carthage that same year, [2] as the rival of Caecilianus, who – so claimed the Donatists – had been consecrated two years earlier by a Bishop who was a “traditor” (i.e. “surrenderer” of sacred Scripture), thus nullifying Caecilianus’ episcopal consecration (cf. Treatise 1.5).   The Donatists contended that those clergy who had proven themselves unworthy during the persecution were not only forbidden to return to their ministry, but also that whatever sacram...

On Athenagoras' apologia for the Christians

Image
  Text of Athenagoras' "Apology"      Athenagoras addresses his apology to joint Roman emperors Marcus Aurelius and Commodus [1] , probably near the end of the former’s life, i.e. c. AD 177. [2]   It seems to me that Athenagoras’ repeated homages to the intellectual acuity of the senior emperor crosses the line between appropriate deference and shameless flattery [3] , but then again, I’m not the “greatest of sovereigns” (echoes of Daniel’s throne-room manner vis-à-vis Nebuchadnezzar) [4] .   Athenagoras starts off strong, labeling pagan religious practice as “ridiculous”.   The satirizing of idolatry, both the so-called gods themselves as well as those who fabricate and worship them, is a constant throughout the apology, reminding us of prophetic critiques of idol-worship such as those found in Second Isaiah. [5]   Athenagoras begins by demonstrating the absurdity of persecuting people simply for bearing the name “Christian”. [6]   Claiming ...