THE BIBLE AS “STORY” # 2 “In the beginning…”
![Image](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhbUKyPaGMNxf7IiCx3-3D0eObpAjnOecZ5lNwopfC-vrUGtXQeBkGQAzWg0rxJr69I40mHZ61HAF7WLD9Qiur-PXUWetdObyDzHUffjWfLKRotjiJmn9dvCN9-NE2czCJcKHJLiyMZnDw/s640/image.jpg)
· What is at stake in our understanding of Genesis chapter 1? o The “inspiration” of Scripture? § The trustworthiness/accuracy of the Bible? o 2 equal and opposite errors to avoid in interpreting Gn. 1 ( we “know” what happened ) § We “know” that Gn. 1 tells us exactly how the universe came into existence and that modern scientific theories are nonsense. · (This error assumes extra-biblical categories of thought; we assume that the Bible gives us the kind of information that modernity tells us we need to have in order to be confident that what we are affirming is true) § We “know” that modern cosmology tells us exactly how the universe came into existence and that the Genesis story is nonsense. · (modern cosmological theories and Gn. 1 are both stories; scientists must assume the physical laws of the universe as they study the universe’s origins; they cannot account for the laws themselves or explain how they came into being, t